P9 complete: compiled kernels validated (byte-identical, 78-80 GSA samples/min/core), scaling report
ci / test (3.12) (push) Failing after 8s
ci / test (3.13) (push) Failing after 10s

Graviton3 c7g.8xlarge, 360 GSE165845 arrays: 360/360 GTCs identical between the Rust
kernels and the pure-Python paths; 1 worker 78-80 samples/min (pure Python 29.6).
Scaling 1->8 workers efficiency 0.87-0.90; above that the 125 MB/s gp3 disk caps the
run (~620 samples/min) and, on a RAM disk, a fixed per-worker start-up cost limits a
360-sample batch to efficiency 0.48 at 32 workers (K-025). Worker state is pickled once.
docs/validation/P9.md, result JSONs, guide/README/CHANGELOG updates.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01814GKVzZVL3FuF3DeiZXhv
This commit is contained in:
kemalandClaude Opus 5.5 committed 2026-09-28 22:32:48 +01:00
1 parent bd19450364
commit ed4895516d
8 files changed
+263 -9

No files matched your search

+1
View File
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Plan §20 lists the open questions; this file records what the implementation ha
| ID | Date | Topic | Finding | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K-025 | 2026-09-28 | Scaling limits (P9) | With the Rust kernels a Graviton3 core genotypes 78–80 GSA samples/min. At > 8 workers a 125 MB/s gp3 volume caps the run at ~620 samples/min (GTC ≈ 13 MB each); on a RAM disk efficiency is 0.77 at 16 and 0.48 at 32 workers for 360 samples, explained by a fixed start-up cost (≈ 2.5 s + 0.2 s per worker). Linear scaling for large batches is inferred from that model, not measured. | `docs/validation/P9.md`; measure a ≥ 5000-sample batch when one is at hand. |
| K-024 | 2026-09-28 | GSE165845 (P8) | GSA-MD v1 chips have no public cluster file; the GSA v1 C1 EGT with the C2 build-38 BPM covers 99.996 % of bead addresses and gives median LogR deviation 0.246 (cluster mismatch, not noise). GSM5051309 (NA20362 rep 2) is a failed array (call rate 0.762, concordance 0.336 with its own replicates). 27 510 array records have no NYGC 30x record and are scored as hom-ref; 1444 of them are systematically called alt. | Recorded in `docs/validation/P8.md`; results reported with and without these. |
| K-023 | 2026-09-28 | P6 optional outputs | Implemented and validated the same day: `--info-fields` (with `--egt`), `--extra-format`, `--merge-snv-indel`, `--auxiliary-loci`, PLINK 2 `.pgen`. Two decisions: OUT-035 rule (d) uses the MNV's last plus-strand base for minus-strand designs (spec amended); `--extra-format` writes NORMX/NORMY missing where the raw intensities are both 0, and THETA/R missing where both normalized intensities are 0 (148 values on 3 GSA samples; gtc2vcf writes 0). | resolved |
| K-022 | 2026-09-28 | VCF oracles' limits (GSA v4 PGx, GRCh38) | gtc2vcf leaves 144 indel probes unresolved (`REF=I`/`D`) that SimurgArray resolves from `SourceSeq`; both leave 49 indels unresolved. GTCtoVCF (python-2.7 era) runs under Python 3 only with two local patches (pyvcf3 `Format` field; skip instead of crash on 3 CYP2D6 indels whose `SourceSeq` has the dash on the right, `[ALLELE/-]`, which SimurgArray handles), and needs the alt-contig loci filtered when the FASTA has no alts. Neither oracle applies ploidy (males' X/Y/MT hets stay diploid). | documented |
+82
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
# Phase P9 validation — performance (compiled kernels)
Date: 2026-09-28. Development and identity checks on the Raspberry Pi 5; scaling on AWS c7g.8xlarge (32 Graviton3
cores, 64 GB) with GSE165845 (360 GSA-MD arrays, GSA-24v1-0 C2 manifest). Cloud cost ≈ $0.25 (three short spot runs,
one of which stopped after 2 min because the image lacked a C linker).
## What was built
Profiling first (`bench/profile_genotype.py`): one GSA sample took 3.4 s on a Pi core, 63 % of it in calling — the
bit-exact port evaluates `exp`/`log10`/`pow` element-wise through CPython's `math` (≈ 6.8 M scalar calls per sample) —
and 24 % in the normalization fit's nearest-neighbour searches. Reading a manifest cost 13 s (GSA) to 53 s (Omni2.5)
per command. The IDAT parser was already negligible (0.02 s), so it was not ported.
`rust/simurg-core` (PyO3 + maturin, optional; imported as `simurg_core`, used through `simurg._core`):
| Kernel | Replaces | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| `call_genotypes` | `genotype.gencall.call_genotypes` | one fused pass per locus: flair SDs, the six likelihood cases, posteriors, sub-scores, score map; every intermediate in the reference's f32/f64 type and order |
| `baf_lrr` | `genotype.baf_lrr.baf_lrr` | canonical NaN 0xFFC00000 kept |
| `exp`, `log10`, `log2`, `pow` | `gencall._libm` | glibc libm (the functions CPython's `math` calls) with CPython's error semantics (NaN passthrough, +NaN on domain error, `log10(0)` = −inf) |
| `closest_binned`, `closest_exact` | the two nearest-neighbour searches of `normalization.fit` | float32 distances, first minimum wins, NaN wins as in `numpy.argmin` |
| `bpm_locus_entries` | `formats.bpm._parse_locus_entries` | same columns, string interning and error messages |
No floating-point contraction: Rust never fuses `a*b+c` (cf. K-012). Without the extension, or with
`SIMURG_PURE_PYTHON=1`, the pure paths run unchanged. Also: address coverage is memoised per IDAT layout (it was
recomputed per sample), and the worker state is pickled once instead of once per worker.
## Acceptance (plan §18 P9)
### Outputs identical to the Python reference
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| `tests/unit/test_core_kernels.py` (19 tests): every kernel vs its pure path on edge values (±0, ±inf, NaN payloads and signs, subnormals, overflow, ties, empty bins, NaN clusters, zero SDs, empty clusters, missing thresholds), bit patterns compared | pass (Pi; on Graviton3 the run log does not show the count, the 360-GTC identity below covers that machine) |
| 36 GSA v4 demo samples (Pi) | 36/36 GTCs byte-identical; `sample_summary.tsv`, `controls_qc.tsv`, `relatedness.tsv` identical |
| 6 Omni2.5 samples, `--preset autocall-1.6.2` (Pi) | 6/6 GTCs and all tables identical |
| 360 GSE165845 samples (Graviton3) | **360/360 GTCs byte-identical**, sample summary identical |
| 5 manifests (GSA v1 C1/C2, GSA v4, GDA v1, Omni2.5) parsed by both BPM parsers | every column identical |
| Oracle tests P1, P3, P4 (vs gtc2vcf/vendor) | pass with the kernels |
### Throughput: ≥ 20 samples/min/core (GSA-size arrays)
| Machine, 1 worker | Pure Python | Kernels |
|---|---|---|
| Graviton3 (360 samples, per-sample phase) | 29.6 samples/min | **78–80 samples/min** (0.75 s per sample) |
| Raspberry Pi 5 (`genotype_sample` only) | 3.4 s per sample | 1.1 s per sample (≈ 55/min) |
Manifest loading: GSA 13 s → 3 s, Omni2.5 53 s → 13 s, GDA 40 s → 10 s (Pi). A 36-sample GSA run on the Pi
(3 workers, with controls and cohort QC) went from 131 s to 45 s.
### Scaling to 32 threads
360 samples, `simurg genotype --no-cohort-qc`, per-sample phase from the run log (`bench/scaling.py`):
| Workers | GTCs on the gp3 disk (125 MB/s) | | GTCs on a RAM disk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | samples/min | efficiency | samples/min | efficiency |
| 1 | 78 | 1.00 | 80 | 1.00 |
| 4 | 290 | 0.93 | 305 | 0.95 |
| 8 | 546 | 0.87 | 578 | 0.90 |
| 16 | 618 | 0.49 | 979 | 0.77 |
| 24 | — | — | 1186 | 0.62 |
| 32 | 619 | 0.25 | 1226 | 0.48 |
* On the default gp3 disk the run is **write-bound** above 8 workers: one GSA GTC is ~13 MB, so ~620 samples/min is
~140 MB/s, the volume's throughput. The pure-Python path hit the same ceiling (550 samples/min at 32 workers).
Faster storage (gp3 with more MB/s, local NVMe, tmpfs) or fewer outputs is needed to go beyond it.
* On a RAM disk the remaining gap is a **fixed start-up cost that grows with the worker count**: measured phase minus
ideal (0.75 s × 360 / workers) is 3.4 s at 4 workers, 3.6 s at 8, 5.2 s at 16, 7.0 s at 24 and 9.2 s at 32
(≈ 2.5 s + 0.2 s per worker: process spawn, imports, manifest context). It does not depend on the number of samples,
so with 360 samples (11 per worker at 32 workers) it dominates. **Inferred, not measured:** for a 10 000-sample batch
at 32 workers the same overhead gives an efficiency of ≈ 0.96. The plan's "linear scaling to 32 threads" is
therefore met for large batches on fast storage, and not for short batches or on a 125 MB/s disk.
* Pickling the worker state once (instead of per worker) did not change start-up on the Pi (4–8 workers: 1.5–2.6 s
either way); it is kept because it removes serial work from the parent.
## Notes
* Remaining per-sample time with the kernels (Pi, 1.1 s): normalization fit 0.53 s (many small robust fits per bin),
calling 0.24 s, normalize/polar 0.08 s, raw X/Y 0.06 s. A full Rust normalization fit is the next step if needed.
* Pi thread scaling is poor (36 samples, 3 workers ≈ 1.7× one core): the Pi 5's memory bandwidth, not the code.
* CI (`.github/workflows/ci.yml`) builds the extension and runs the unit tests with and without it.
+1
View File
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{"gtcs": 360, "differ": 0, "sample_summary": "identical"}
+74
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
{
"samples": 360,
"backend": "rust 1.0.0",
"cpu_count": 32,
"machine": "aarch64",
"runs": [
{
"threads": 1,
"rc": 0,
"wall_s": 299.1,
"setup_s": 6.9,
"per_sample_phase_s": 276.63,
"samples_per_min": 78.1,
"samples_per_min_per_core": 78.1,
"speedup_vs_first": 1.0,
"efficiency": 1.0
},
{
"threads": 2,
"rc": 0,
"wall_s": 166.5,
"setup_s": 7.1,
"per_sample_phase_s": 143.78,
"samples_per_min": 150.2,
"samples_per_min_per_core": 75.1,
"speedup_vs_first": 1.92,
"efficiency": 0.96
},
{
"threads": 4,
"rc": 0,
"wall_s": 96.9,
"setup_s": 6.8,
"per_sample_phase_s": 74.58,
"samples_per_min": 289.6,
"samples_per_min_per_core": 72.4,
"speedup_vs_first": 3.71,
"efficiency": 0.927
},
{
"threads": 8,
"rc": 0,
"wall_s": 61.9,
"setup_s": 6.8,
"per_sample_phase_s": 39.56,
"samples_per_min": 546.0,
"samples_per_min_per_core": 68.3,
"speedup_vs_first": 6.99,
"efficiency": 0.874
},
{
"threads": 16,
"rc": 0,
"wall_s": 57.4,
"setup_s": 6.9,
"per_sample_phase_s": 34.98,
"samples_per_min": 617.5,
"samples_per_min_per_core": 38.6,
"speedup_vs_first": 7.91,
"efficiency": 0.494
},
{
"threads": 32,
"rc": 0,
"wall_s": 57.4,
"setup_s": 6.9,
"per_sample_phase_s": 34.91,
"samples_per_min": 618.8,
"samples_per_min_per_core": 19.3,
"speedup_vs_first": 7.92,
"efficiency": 0.247
}
]
}
+74
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
{
"samples": 360,
"backend": "rust 1.0.0",
"cpu_count": 32,
"machine": "aarch64",
"runs": [
{
"threads": 1,
"rc": 0,
"wall_s": 292.6,
"setup_s": 6.8,
"per_sample_phase_s": 270.27,
"samples_per_min": 79.9,
"samples_per_min_per_core": 79.9,
"speedup_vs_first": 1.0,
"efficiency": 1.0
},
{
"threads": 4,
"rc": 0,
"wall_s": 93.3,
"setup_s": 6.8,
"per_sample_phase_s": 70.94,
"samples_per_min": 304.5,
"samples_per_min_per_core": 76.1,
"speedup_vs_first": 3.81,
"efficiency": 0.953
},
{
"threads": 8,
"rc": 0,
"wall_s": 59.7,
"setup_s": 6.8,
"per_sample_phase_s": 37.37,
"samples_per_min": 578.0,
"samples_per_min_per_core": 72.2,
"speedup_vs_first": 7.23,
"efficiency": 0.904
},
{
"threads": 16,
"rc": 0,
"wall_s": 44.4,
"setup_s": 6.8,
"per_sample_phase_s": 22.06,
"samples_per_min": 979.3,
"samples_per_min_per_core": 61.2,
"speedup_vs_first": 12.25,
"efficiency": 0.766
},
{
"threads": 24,
"rc": 0,
"wall_s": 40.6,
"setup_s": 6.8,
"per_sample_phase_s": 18.22,
"samples_per_min": 1185.6,
"samples_per_min_per_core": 49.4,
"speedup_vs_first": 14.83,
"efficiency": 0.618
},
{
"threads": 32,
"rc": 0,
"wall_s": 40.0,
"setup_s": 6.8,
"per_sample_phase_s": 17.62,
"samples_per_min": 1225.7,
"samples_per_min_per_core": 38.3,
"speedup_vs_first": 15.34,
"efficiency": 0.479
}
]
}